| |
|
Alert Type: | Updated * |
Bug Id: | CSCuw14948 | Title: | HSRP vip ping failure after power off one side Router with SM module |
|
Status: | Fixed |
|
Severity: | 2 Severe |
Description: | Symptom:
HSRP vip ping failure after power off one side Router with SM module
Conditions:
After power off one side Router with SM module, at other side from SM module,
ping physical ip of router there is no problem, but ping vip at router failed.
Workaround:
Reconfig HSRP of the one with ping issue
Further Problem Description:
|
|
Last Modified: | 12-NOV-2015 |
|
Known Affected Releases: | 15.3(3)M4 |
|
Known Fixed Releases: * | 15.6(1.6)T |
|
|
| |
| |
|
Alert Type: | Updated * |
Bug Id: | CSCur66196 | Title: | OvrTh value is wrong in enhanced-history distribution stats |
|
Status: | Fixed |
|
Severity: | 3 Moderate |
Description: | Symptom:
OvrTh value is wrong in enhanced-history distribution stats
Conditions:
Cisco 3900 running 15.1(3)T4
Workaround:
Verify the over threshold operations using "show ip sla statistics"
Further Problem Description:
|
|
Last Modified: | 20-NOV-2015 |
|
Known Affected Releases: | 15.1(3)T4 |
|
Known Fixed Releases: * | 15.2(4.0)ST, 15.2(4.0.64a)E, 15.2(5.0)ST, 15.3(1)IE101.187, 15.5(1.13)T, 15.5(2)S, 15.5(2.1)S, 16.1(0.5), 7.0(3)I2(0.47), 7.0(3)I2(1) |
|
|
| |
| |
|
Alert Type: | Updated * |
Bug Id: | CSCuv01746 | Title: | DLEP VRF aware support request |
|
Status: | Fixed |
|
Severity: | 3 Moderate |
Description: | Symptom:
Physical interface configured under a certain VRF, breaks DLEP adjacency with radio device.
For instance:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.99
ip address 192.168.1.25 255.255.255.0
vrf forwarding VRF-TEST <<< If we add this line, the DLEP adjacency goes down.
!
interface Virtual-Template99
!
interface vmi99
ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/0.99
vrf forwarding VRF-TEST <<< DLEP works fine with VMI interface configured with a VRF. However since it uses IP unnumbered, the IP address is not considered part of the VRF Routing table and remains in Global Routing table.
!
Conditions:
VRF configured under a physical interface which we intend to use for DLEP adjacency.
Workaround:
Do not configure a physical interface intended to be used for DLEP under any VRF.
Further Problem Description:
VMI interface used by DLEP is going down and neighbor getting deleted when physical interfaces is configured under a VRF (not in Global Routing table).
|
|
Last Modified: | 11-NOV-2015 |
|
Known Affected Releases: | 15.4(3)M |
|
Known Fixed Releases: * | 15.4(3)M3.2, 15.4(3)M4, 15.5(1)T2.1, 15.5(2)T2, 15.5(3)M0.2, 15.6(0.9)T |
|
|
| |
2015 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 
没有评论:
发表评论